Correction: Psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire among dialysis patients with cardio renal syndrome

Frontiers in Psychology Journal Issues Correction Regarding Funding for Study on Dialysis Patients

A significant correction has been issued by Frontiers in Psychology, a peer-reviewed academic journal, concerning a study that investigated the psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire among dialysis patients with cardio renal syndrome. The correction, published on March 27, 2026, addresses an omission in the original article’s funding statement, specifically the exclusion of a crucial financial supporter of the research. The original article, identified by the DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1717948, has now been updated to reflect the complete funding information.

The core of the correction lies in the acknowledgment of "The Science and Technology Plan Research Project of Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology," with the project identification number 252102311148, as a key financial backer of the work. This omission, though seemingly minor, is vital for academic transparency and the proper attribution of research support. The journal’s statement clarifies that the original article erroneously omitted this funder.

The revised funding statement now reads: "The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This project was supported by the Science and Technology Plan Research Project of Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology, 252102311148." This ensures that all parties contributing to the research, including governmental and provincial scientific bodies, are appropriately recognized.

Background of the Study and the Importance of Adherence

The original study, "Psychometric properties of an Arabic language version of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire among dialysis patients with cardio renal syndrome," delved into a critical area of patient care. Cardio renal syndrome (CRS) is a complex medical condition where dysfunction in one organ system leads to dysfunction in the other. In the context of dialysis patients, this often means that individuals are managing severe kidney disease alongside cardiovascular complications.

Treatment adherence is paramount for patients with chronic conditions like CRS. This includes adhering to medication schedules, dietary restrictions, fluid intake limits, and regular dialysis sessions. Non-adherence can lead to a cascade of negative health outcomes, including increased hospitalizations, poorer disease management, accelerated progression of both renal and cardiac disease, and ultimately, a reduced quality of life and increased mortality rates.

Developing reliable and valid assessment tools, such as questionnaires, is essential for researchers and clinicians to accurately measure adherence levels and identify barriers to effective treatment. The use of an Arabic language version of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire is particularly significant, as it aims to facilitate research and clinical practice within Arabic-speaking populations, where such validated instruments may have been previously limited.

Chronology of the Correction

While the exact date of the initial publication of the original article is not explicitly stated within the correction notice, the correction itself was published on March 27, 2026. The correction notice clearly indicates the original article’s publication details: Front. Psychol. 17:1717948, published in 2026.

The process leading to this correction likely involved a review by the journal’s editorial team or an alert from the authors themselves, recognizing the oversight in acknowledging the full scope of funding. Academic publishing often involves a period where minor errors or omissions can be rectified through published corrections or errata. This particular correction was formally published as a distinct article within the journal, ensuring it is indexed and discoverable.

The timeline for the revision and publication of corrections can vary. In this case, the correction was issued relatively soon after the original article’s publication, suggesting a prompt response from the journal to address the oversight. The received, revised, and accepted dates for the correction itself are listed as March 16, 2026, March 16, 2026, and March 17, 2026, respectively, with the publication date of March 27, 2026. This rapid turnaround highlights the journal’s commitment to maintaining accuracy and transparency in its published content.

Supporting Data and the Significance of Funding

The omission of a funding source, especially a provincial government initiative like the "Science and Technology Plan Research Project of Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology," carries several implications. Such projects are often awarded through competitive application processes and represent a significant investment in scientific research. Acknowledging this funding not only credits the supporting body but also provides a degree of validation for the research itself, indicating it has met certain standards to receive public or institutional support.

The financial backing from such a project suggests that the research on treatment adherence among dialysis patients with cardio renal syndrome was deemed important enough to warrant public investment in the Henan Province. This could stem from a recognized need to improve healthcare outcomes for a vulnerable patient population within that region. The specific project number, 252102311148, serves as a unique identifier for this particular grant, allowing for further tracking and verification of the funding.

While the article doesn’t provide specific figures for the grant amount, the mere inclusion of this funder underscores the collaborative effort and resource allocation involved in conducting robust scientific research. It also highlights the international nature of scientific inquiry, as the original study involves authors from various backgrounds (indicated by names like Laradhi, Getu, Shan, Al Raimi, Hussien, Albani, Al-khadher, and Allawy), and the research is supported by a Chinese provincial department.

Official Responses and Publisher’s Note

The correction notice itself serves as the primary official response from the publisher, Frontiers Media SA. The "Publisher’s note" within the broader article structure reiterates the standard disclaimer: "All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher." This standard disclaimer is crucial for maintaining the integrity and objectivity of scientific publications, separating the authors’ findings and interpretations from the journal’s official stance.

The authors of the original study, Laradhi, A. O., Getu, M. A., Shan, Y., Al Raimi, A. M., Hussien, N. A., Albani, G., Al-khadher, M. A., and Allawy, M. E., are implicitly involved in this correction. The responsibility for ensuring accurate funding information typically rests with the authors during the submission and revision process. Their inclusion in the correction notice signifies their role in the original research and the acknowledgment of the updated funding details.

The editorial office of Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland, is noted as the approving body for the article, indicating the final stage of the journal’s internal review and approval process.

Broader Impact and Implications

This correction, while specific to one study, underscores the importance of meticulous record-keeping and transparency in academic publishing. Inaccurate or incomplete funding information can have several implications:

• Academic Integrity: Proper attribution of funding is a cornerstone of academic integrity. It ensures that research is not misrepresented and that all contributing entities are recognized.
• Reproducibility and Verification: Knowing the funding source can sometimes offer insights into potential biases or the specific objectives of the research, aiding in its critical evaluation.
• Grant Management and Accountability: Funding bodies, especially public ones, require transparency in how their resources are used and acknowledged. Omissions can hinder accountability and future funding opportunities.
• Researcher Reputation: While this appears to be an oversight, consistent inaccuracies in reporting can negatively impact a researcher’s or institution’s reputation.
• Future Research: Accurate citation of funding can help other researchers identify potential collaborators or funding streams for similar work.

The study’s focus on treatment adherence among dialysis patients with cardio renal syndrome remains a critical area for public health. As global populations age and the prevalence of chronic diseases like kidney disease and cardiovascular disease continues to rise, understanding and improving patient adherence to complex treatment regimens is essential. Tools like the Arabic version of the Treatment Adherence Questionnaire, once fully validated and supported by complete acknowledgments, can contribute significantly to this effort by enabling more accurate assessments and targeted interventions.

The keywords associated with the article – cardiorenal syndrome, dialysis, reliability, treatment adherence, and validity – highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the research and its relevance to clinical practice and psychometric science. The correction ensures that the foundational elements of the study’s publication, including its financial support, are accurately documented for the scientific community. The open-access nature of the article, distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), further promotes the dissemination of this research, albeit with the clarified funding details now in place.